Don’t Forget Risk Management When Betting on Bitcoin

The initial step to turning into a gainful Bitcoin broker is following a trained way to deal with chance administration. In this guide, Crypto Briefing diagrams some hazard the board strategies that will go far in boosting gainfulness.

No Reward Without Risk

Risk and prize are cut out of the same cloth.

Speculators are remunerated for the measure of hazard they take. This is definitely why putting resources into incipient advances like Bitcoin and Ethereum yields far superior returns than the customary financial exchange.

However, every merchant – retail or institutional – has a hazard craving that is characterized by different boundaries, for example, the size of one’s venture corpus, pay levels, age, and different variables.

Realizing how to assess your hazard profile is the foundation of overseeing hazard.

Taking on dangers that are past one’s limit is a catastrophe waiting to happen. Misfortunes can compound rapidly, clearing out entire exchanging accounts.

This occurs very frequently – particularly in crypto.

Replicating the hazard the board boundaries of merchants via web-based networking media can likewise destroy exchanging accounts. This possibly bodes well on the off chance that one has a comparable foundation and hazard limit as the dealer they’re impersonating.

A dealer whose standard position size is $100 can’t imitate the hazard the board of a merchant who effectively opens $100,000 positions.

Without hazard the board, it’s difficult to get beneficial. This is on the grounds that productive brokers let their triumphant positions roll and cut their misfortunes early.

In this guide, Crypto Briefing will spread out a fundamental system for overseeing hazard.

Establishing Risk Management

Position Sizing and Stop Losses

Trading is all about minimizing losses and maximizing wins. That said, the process is more of an art than a science, varying from person to person.

But the first rule of risk management is to ask oneself: How much of a loss can I afford to sustain on a single trade?

Typically, it is recommended that one limits the risk per trade to 1-3% of their total trading account.

This concept, however, is subject to widespread misinterpretation.

Some sources incorrectly claim this means you should enter every trade with a position size that is 1-3% of your total portfolio. But it actually means that you should be willing to put 1-3% of your equity at risk.

For example, if Alice has a $1,000 trading account, it doesn’t mean her notional position size should be $10-30; it means she should be willing the lose a maximum of $10-30 on each trade.

But how do you ensure you limit risk in this way?

A trader can ensure their loss per trade has an upper limit when they employ a stop loss.

Stop losses shouldn’t be placed arbitrarily. Instead, one should place it at the point where their trade idea is invalidated.

Say the price of BTC is $9,500, and Bob believes there is room for more upside, but if BTC goes to $9,280, the market structure turns bearish, and this idea is invalidated. Now Bob, whose trading account is worth $25,000, previously decided he will risk no more than $250 per trade.

So, Bob will buy one BTC at $9,500, placing a stop loss at $9,250, thereby limiting his maximum loss to $250 ($9,500 – $9,250). 

But why does Bob place it $30 below his invalidation level?

Because when a certain level looks like the point of invalidation for many market participants, whales will run price just beyond that level to source liquidity and direct price in the opposite direction.

This is just an extra step for precaution in hyper-volatile crypto markets.

Trade Selectivity

An underrated aspect of risk management is ensuring one only takes trades where the reward-risk ratio is favorable. In the absolute worst-case scenario, the reward-risk ratio should be one where the potential gain is equal to the potential loss.

This means if a trader is risking $10, the minimum profit from the asset reaching their target price should be $10.

Trades with a reward-risk below one make no sense because the trader stands to lose more than they can ever gain.

To supplement this, some traders have a minimum reward-risk that is much higher.

By only taking trades where the reward-risk ratio is, say, three or higher, traders can ensure they only risk their capital when the potential payout is two orders of magnitude higher.

Building a Dynamic Plan With Experience

Each trader will employ different styles of trading that have varied merits and drawbacks.

After an adequate amount of time staying disciplined with strict rules, traders can start to mold their risk parameters around their strengths and weaknesses.

Some may start to employ a trailing stop loss because their ability to locate profit-taking zones is inferior, and others might increase/decrease the risk they take based on the reward-risk ratio.

The bottom line is that there is no one size fits all risk management and trading framework. Each individual is tasked with setting their own risk parameters and adjusting until they find a working system.

Employing disciplined risk management is the first step to trading profitability.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *